MLK And Malcolm X Essay Research Paper free essay sample

MLK And Malcolm X Essay, Research Paper MLK and Malcolm Ten: Different Tacticss Same Results Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X grew up in different environments. King was raised in a comfy middle-class household where instruction was steadfastly stressed. Malcolm X, on the other manus came from an underprivileged place, where instruction was non such a large trade. Malcolm X was a self taught adult male, who received small schooling and rose to greatness on his ain due to his ain intelligence and finding. The early backgrounds of the two were clearly responsible for the distinguishable different responses to their battle against American racism. With King being a knowing adult male, he had read up on non-violence, and would utilize non-violence as the maneuver of the Civil Rights Movement in which he led. Malcolm X, nevertheless chose self-defence and force as the method for acquiring his point across. Although Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X used different methods, they were both after the same thing, and that was racial and societal equality for all races. Martin Luther King, Jr. was born into a household whose name was already good established in Atlanta, GA. King? s parents made sure that their kid was secured and good taken attention of. Malcolm X nevertheless was raised in a wholly different atmosphere. He was raised in an ambiance of fright and choler, where his seeds of resentment were planted. When Malcolm X ( his name was Malcolm Little at this point in clip ) was little his household was force to travel to Michigan due to changeless torment from the Klu Klux Klan. Once the household arrived in Michigan, things merely seemed to acquire worse. His male parent was killed, his female parent had a nervous dislocation, and was placed in mental infirmary, and the remainder of his household was split up. Malcolm was haunted by this early incubus for most of his life. From that point in his life hatred and a desire for retaliation drove him. Through the motions, King had a more positive attitude towards integrating than that of Malcolm X. King believed that through peaceable presentations and statements, that inkinesss would someday accomplish full equality with Whites. Malcolm X? s desperation about life was reflected in his angry, pessimistic belief that equality is impossible because Whites had no ethical motives towards inkinesss. King had a more integrationalist type doctrine, where he felt that inkinesss and Whites should be united and unrecorded together in peace. Malcolm X, nevertheless believed in a breakaway doctrine. He believed that merely through revolution and force that inkinesss could obtain their rightful topographic point in society. Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered their messages through powerful, trenchant addresss. However, their purposes were delivered in different manners with different intents. ? King was fundamentally a peaceable leader who urged non-violence to his followings. He traveled about the state giving addresss that inspired black and white hearers to work together for racial harmony. ? ( pg. 135, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Freedom Movement ) Malcolm X, for the most portion believed that non-violence and integrating was a fast one by Whites to maintain inkinesss in the topographic point the they wanted to maintain them in. He was ferocious with white racism and encouraged his followings, through his addresss to lift up and support themselves against their white enemies. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King childhood # 8217 ; s had powerful influences on the work forces they became and their addresss. Malcolm X was brought up in an ambiance on force. During his childhood, Malcolm X saw all the maltreatment that his female parent and male parent had received from Whites, due to the colour of their tegument. Malcolm X? s bitterness towards Whites increased as he suffered through the depredations of incorporate schooling. Malcolm X was an intelligent pupil who shared the dream of being a attorney. That dream was shot down by one of his instructors who told him to concentrate on things that were in world, gettable. Although Malcolm X was an intelligent pupil, Malcolm X? s choler caused him to drop out of school. He so moved to Boston with his half sister, Ella, where he began to acquire involved into the street life and offense. From Boston, he went on to Harlem, New York, where he began to sell and utilize drugs and would subsequently, back in Boston, set up a burglary ring to back up his wont of drug usage. Malcolm X? s ill will and publicity of force as a manner of acquiring alteration was clearly something he had learned from the experiences of his childhood. Martin Luther King Jr. lived in an wholly different environment. He was a smart pupil, who skipped two classs before come ining an Ivy League college at merely the age of 15. He was the category valedictory speaker with an A mean. King paraded his graduation nowadays in a new green Chevrolet before his fellow alumnuss. He was raised in the perfect environment where dreams and love were generated. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X childhood # 8217 ; s were? a survey in polarity. ? ( pg. 254, Reflecting Black ) Whereas, Malcolm X was raised in bloodcurdling conditions, King? s place was about dream-like. He was raised in a comfy middle-class place where strong values natured his sense of dignity. Sure, many have admired Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. for the manner that they preached. ? Both King and Malcolm X promoted self-knowledge and regard for one? s history and civilization as a footing of unity. ? ( pg. 253, Reflecting Black. ) Other than the fact that they were similar in some ways, they besides had many differences that people admired, both in address and belief. Malcolm X, in many ways, was known to many as an extremist. For most of the clip that he spent as an Islamic curate, he preached about segregation between inkinesss and Whites. He besides preached about Black Nationalism, some would name it black domination. Malcolm X was a individual who had been misled all through his life. This can be easy shown particularly at the clip when he broke off from the Black Muslim Party, because he realized that they were misdirecting him by stating him that segregation between inkinesss and Whites is the lone manner to travel. They besides misled him by stating him that segregation was portion of the Islamic faith. He realized that he had been lied to on a pilgrims journey to Mecca. Malcolm X? s life was seen by many as a incubus because he was abused and haunted by both inkinesss and Whites. He repeatedly talked about how the white adult male still saw the black adult male as a slave. He saw the white adult male as a Satan. He described America as a house with a bomb indoors, and he saw it as a topographic point that was about to detonate. Martin Luther King, Jr. , besides sometimes referred to as an extremist, appeared to many as unagitated and idealistic. Many say his composure came from his peaceable middle-class life. For case, King preached about equality for inkinesss and Whites. He besides preached about acquiring this equality trough a non-violent manner. King? s was seen as the most popular of the many black leaders. ? King urged inkinesss to win their rightful topographic point in society by deriving self-respect, high moral criterions, difficult work, and leading. He besides urged inkinesss to make this in a non-violent manner. ? ( pg. 255, Reflecting Black ) The difference between the Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. backgrounds had a direct influence on their ulterior point of views. As a black young person, Malcolm X was rebellious and angry. He blamed the hapless societal conditions that inkinesss lived in on the Whites. While life in the ghetto Malcolm learned to reject the non-violence impression and integrating. Alternatively he chose to accept a breakaway doctrine. As a consequence, ? Malcolm X recommended a separationist and nationalist scheme for black survival. ? ( pg. 57, Malcolm Ten: The Man and His Timess ) He believed that merely through force would condition alteration. He saw no grounds that white society had any moral scruples and he promoted the function of the angry black race against a racialist America. King? s doctrines present a crisp contrast to those of Malcolm X. He believe that through difficult work, strong leading, and non-violent tactics, that inkinesss could accomplish full equality with Whites. His belief in non-violence even extended to a adult female who about killed him. King was reported as stating, ? wear? t persecute her, acquire her healed. ? ( pg. 52, Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Movement ) Near the terminal of their lives, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X? s beliefs became more similar. Malcolm X corrected himself after his interruption with the Black Muslim motion. He now emphasized integrity and alteration through black pride instead than through hatred and retaliation. King, on the other manus, became slightly angry at the deficiency of advancement made on racial equality. At one point in clip, Malcolm X really wanted? to fall in forces with King and the progressive elements of the Civil Right? s Movement. ? ( pg. 262, Malcolm Ten: The Man and His Timess ) To many, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were heroes of the Civil Rights Movement. However, many have seen a really pessimistic side to King, while Malcolm X was more optimistic towards segregation for most of his life. Some have said that later on in their lives, the two began taking opposite functions and changed. The addresss of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X reflected both work forces? s visions on bettering America. Both work forces believed that if inkinesss were to achieve freedom, they foremost needed to accomplish dignity. However, Malcolm X? s addresss were delivered in a radical tone which could motivate his hearers and followings into the hate of white America. Malcolm X used direct and to the point linguistic communication which could be understood by all degrees of society. Malcolm X? s creativeness with linguistic communication helped construct the Black Muslim Movement in the United States. In his? Definition of a Revolution? address, delivered in November 1963, Malcolm X openly justifies force as a manner of deriving equality. ? And if it is fight for America to outline us and learn us how to be violent in defence of the state, so isn? t it right for you and me to make whatever is necessary to support our ain people right here in this country. ? ( pg. 253, Malcolm Ten: The Man and His Timess ) He encouraged inkinesss to detest white America and to revolt against them. ? Revolution is bloody, revolution is hostile, revolution knows no via media, revolution upsets and destroys everything that gets in its way. ? ( pg. 255, Malcolm Ten: The Man and His Timess ) In his address? God? s Judgement of White America, ? delivered on December 1, 1963, Malcolm X once more promoted his separationist doctrine. ? America must put aside some separate district here n the Western Hemisphere where the two races can populate apart from each other, since we surely wear? t get along peacefully while we are here together. ? ( pg. 287, Malcolm Ten: The Man a nd His Timess ) After Malcolm X? s pilgrims journey to Mecca in 1964, he reappraised white America and modified slightly his racialist and anti-white beliefs. This alteration is reflected in his? Communication and Reality? spoken to the American Domestic Peace Corps. ? I am against any signifier of racism. We are all against racism. I believe in Allah. I believe in the brotherhood of adult male, all work forces, but I do non believe in the brotherhood with anybody who does non desire brotherhood with me. ? ( pg. 289, Malcolm Ten: The Man and His Timess ) Martin Luther King Jr. was and every bit strong talker. Dr. King on the other manus used a more sophisticated manner in order to make the educated. He used most of his addresss to promote white and black people to work together for racial harmoniousness. He particularly wanted to learn waxy black young person that equality could be gained through non-violent methods. King stated that, ? nonviolent action, the Negro saw, was the manner to supplement-not replace-the procedure of alteration through legal resort. It was a manner to deprive himself of passiveness without ranging himself in revengeful force. ? ( pg. 36, Why We Can? t Wait ) These ideals are brooding in his celebrated? I have a dream? address, where Martin Luther King, Jr. addressed to over 250,000 people. In this address, King urges black people to neer bury their dreams. King preaches that in the eyes of God, the inkinesss are every bit good as any other race and should be treated as peers. ? I have a dream that one twent y-four hours every vale will be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the unsmooth topographic points shall be made field, and the crooked topographic points shall be made consecutive, and the glorification of the Godhead shall be revealed, and all shall see it together. ? ( Internet, Martin Luther King? s I Have a Dream Speech ) Unlike Malcolm X, King does non motivate his followings to riot and detest, but encourages his followings to retrieve that all people are God # 8217 ; s Children and that hopefully one twenty-four hours all Americans can fall in together to sing? My state? Ti of thee, Sweet land of autonomy, of thee I sing? ? ( cyberspace, Martin Luther King? s I Have a Dream Speech ) Martin Luther King? s eventual disenchantment became because of the deficiency of success the inkinesss were doing in America. This uncomfortableness is reflected in many of Dr. King? s addresss. In some of his addresss, Dr. King openly condemns American engagement in the Vietnam War. He believed that America should work out its ain racial and societal job before directing vulnerable immature work forces, particularly black work forces, to contend for something that was traveling on in the topographic point in which they lived. Dr. King along with the remainder of the state were forced to watch the barbarous sarcasm of watching black and white work forces in the intelligence and on telecasting as they killed and died together for a state that was unable to accept populating along side one another because of race or the colour of their tegument. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are both remembered as leaders who fought for a difference in black America. Both tried to convey hope to inkinesss in a state where the white America did non socially accept them. Even though the two had different ways of advancing their message both tried to transfuse within inkinesss the power and strength the race needed in order rise above all the hatred that surrounded them. Malcolm X had a much more radical attack, that could be good traced to his background. He had gone through so much, seen so many things, but still wanted his people as a race to endeavor in a socially challenged America, where they had non been accepted since being transported to America from their fatherland of Africa. Martin Luther King Jr. had a much more unagitated attack to acquiring the state of affairss solved. Many have said that this non-violent attack came from his safe, middle-class environment. Although King did non digest the many adversities that Malcolm X endured, he knew what was traveling on, but his parents instilled in him the attitudes of making what he thought was morally right. King used that attitude to implement his non-violence direct action maneuver. The kineticss of King? s Moral value of non-violence was really apparent in the brand up of his character. This is why the maneuver of active non-violence ( sit-ins, protest Marches ) had put civil rights straight on the national docket, and this is why Martin Luther King, Jr. , the American civil rights leader is known for his leading excellence. In the terminal even though the two were different in turn toing their messages about black regard and pride, they both had a common end. That end was to accomplish equality between all races. Although they were different in the beginning, in the terminal the two both gave their lives making what was right, and the sunglassess off the eyes of an America that was blinded by racism.